WebThe petitioners-landlords filed an application for eviction of the respondent under Section 14(1)(e)rsad with Section 25-Bof the Act which was dismissed by the Controller on 29th April, 1978. Webunder Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA); contention was that the petitioner is the landlord/owner of the premises; the premises had been let out to respondent No. 1 vide an oral agreement sometime in the year 1985 for a residential purpose at the rent of Rs.300/- per month which was exclusive of electricity charge.
Mesure de l
Web- (1) In every proceeding of the recovery of possession of any premises on the ground specified in clause (a) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 14, the Controller shall, after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard, make an order directing the tenant … Web5 Aug 2024 · Published on : 5 Aug, 2024, 5:11 pm. 5 min read. The Supreme Court today held that its 2008 judgment of Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by LRs. v. Union of India & Anr. relating to the interpretation of Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (Act) is good law. Hence, the same need not be referred to a larger Bench for reconsideration. brand new groove
Can possession of a tenanted commercial property be recovered …
Web26 Dec 2024 · A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, on Friday, referred to the Division Bench several questions of relationship and interplay between Section 14(1)(e) and Section 22 of the Delhi Rent ... Webtenant and the tenant is not given benefit of tendering of rent under Section 14(2) of the said Act. 8. There is no doubt that even in case of second default, the eviction of tenant can be sought by the landlord only under Section 14(1) (a) and 14(1) (a) provides that eviction petition can be filed where the tenant has neither Web3. Had the High Court jurisdiction in the second appeal under section 3. It is analogous to s. 14(1) (a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. 4. There is no ground oí Dona, jiae personai … haileybilesss instagram